🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where African descendants are paid to speak with predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has developed since those days, placing less emphasis on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and more on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament gains confidence to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. At the same time, far-right parties are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A campaign to remove African American heritage and legacy from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a professor at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and provides room for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the history when it ignores the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Organizations who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the dangers that face all if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.